On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:28:51 -0800 (PST) Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Felix K_hling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alex, > > > > I'm working on 3D support for Savage IX right now. I've added > > register > > structures for SavageIX. Now I need to find out the chipset type in > > the > > 3D driver. That requires a few small modifications to the 2D driver. > > I'm > > not sure if I should work with the old or your new 2D driver. I'd > > prefer > > to work with your version, but I'd feel much more comfortable if it > > was > > in CVS so that we can keep our work in sync. > > > > That's fine with me. My only reason for not putting it into cvs is > that there are still some broken bits, but I guess it's an unstable > branch anyway; plus I plan to fix those problems sooner rather than > later (probably this coming week). How should we work this? I can > just commit it, or we can move to a new branch. doesn't really matter > to me. I think you could just commit to the existing branch for now. I sort of planned to make a new branch when we move the 3D driver to Mesa CVS, much like what's happening with mach64 right now. I just havn't decided when the right time for that would be. Maybe we can talk about that on IRC tomorrow. > > Alex > Felix > [snip] ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
