That seems to be only half the truth. It looks like someone tried to implement it, but according to the comment it didn't work. It's still defined in the cst state atom and in the drm if I see that correctly.Seems to be quite complicated. Though wouldn't it be a better idea to figure out why it doesn't work in the first place? R200/RV250 should support this, but apparently for some reason it doesn't work. According to r200_reg.h, the chip should also be able to handle ARB_point_sprite in hardware.
It doesn't work because it's not implemented in the driver. :)
I don't think the R200 hardware natively supports large points, but it's hrad to say without hardware documentation.Since it has a dedicated pointsize register (R200_RE_POINTSIZE) I tend to disagree. Could be broken of course, who knows.
Roland
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
