On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:05:21AM -0400, David Dawes wrote: > I don't see anything new or unusual about what I said. A similar thing > happened with the 4.3 release -- there was no wholesale merge of the > then DRI trunk into XFree86 at the point of the feature freeze.
> The only difference I can see is that I was more involved in DRI stuff > at the time and so did a lot of the work to make sure that patches for > bug fixes originating here made it into XFree86. That included creating > a "for XFree86 release" branch in the DRI repository, separating out > the relevant patches, and even going through the DRI commit logs to > create useful changelog entries when bringing them into XFree86. Just > in case it wasn't clear, I did all of this as a DRI developer, not as > an XFree86 developer. > > My personal priorities now lie in other areas, so someone else, preferably > someone who keeps up with DRI development more closely than I do these > days, will have to do all of this. That is, if the DRI developers > collectively want anything that hasn't already been merged to appear in > the XFree86 4.4 release. If they don't, then there's no problem, right? Probably I made a bad interpertation, but from your words it seemed that there would be no wholesale merge of the DRI trunk into XFree86 *ever*, neither by you or anyone else. But I now understand it's a personal shift of priorities rather than a seperation of the DRI<->XFree86 projects. Sorry for jumping on the gun. Jose Fonseca ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
