Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dri-
| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-20-09 05:59 -------
> 1) Why does X not unload the "r128" module at time of quitting, given that it
> is X which does the loading ?
Because it's not necessary. The mere fact that it remains loaded doesn't prevent
anything.
> 2) Why does DRI work only with /dev/dri/card0 only ?
It shouldn't, and the X server will create the device nodes on the fly as needed.
Please provide more information such as an X server log from a failed attempt.
(Maybe the real problem is that the r128 DRM in kernel 2.4.22 doesn't
deinitialize correctly? Have you tried a DRM from current XFree86 or DRI CVS?)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
