On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 13:21, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:15:18PM +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 13:07, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:19, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > > > I've started the XFree86 4.3.99.12 merge into the DRI trunk. > > > > > > > > > > So has IPv6 support been ironed out in XFree86 CVS? Last I heard, it > > > > > didn't work on systems without IPv6 support... > > > > > > > > I'm not sure, but..... > > > > > > > > Do DRI developers need to worry about that ? > > > > > > It's no problem for me personally, no idea about other developers, but > > > what about users? > > > > They didn't have IPv6 before, so if it doesn't work now, there's still > > no problem for users. > > But the problem I'm talking about is that IPv4 didn't work either on > systems without IPv6 support. Has this been resolved? I'm not sure, but I'm sure there would have been a lot of bitching if it was still broken. I haven't seen any comments like that recently.
> > > Also, it might be bad timing right now that we're trying to move the CVS > > > to freedesktop.org, but Eric would have to comment on that. > > > > It's pretty easy to pick up the current CVS and drop it onto another > > site. I'll do it, if Eric has a problem with that. > > AFAIK he's been trying to grab a tarball of the repository for a while, > but sf.net has been a bitch. I thought the problems SF has was just anonymous users, Eric has real developer access so this shouldn't be a problem. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
