The 2D driver supports all savage chips, but the 3D driver seems to
only support the Prosavage and Twister (savage4 core) integrated chips:
from savage_driver.c:
if ((psav->Chipset == S3_TWISTER)
|| (psav->Chipset == S3_PROSAVAGE)) {
/* Setup DRI after visuals have been established */
psav->directRenderingEnabled = SAVAGEDRIScreenInit(pScreen);
} else
psav->directRenderingEnabled = FALSE;
I don't know how different the savage3D and savage4 cores are. There
may also be some issues with shared vs. discrete video ram.
Alex
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Actually the savage mx/ix chips are based on the old savage3D core,
> > while the DRI driver is for savage4/prosavage cores. I don't know
> how
> > similar they are and whether the driver S3/VIA released will work
> on
> > the older savage3D based chips like the mx or ix. they might need
> a
> > separate driver much like the radeon r100 vs. r200.
>
> Alan Cox in a previous email said the savage driver from S3 was for:
> Savage MX/IX/ SuperSavage/ ProSavage/ Twister/K
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel