On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:51, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > BTW, have you added atimisc_drv.o to the r200, radeon and rage128
> > snapshots as a reaction to the recent radeon 2D driver problems? It
> > should be ati_drv.o instead.
>
> No, it always had been there (from the original dripkg.sh, IIRC). Is it
> unnecessary for the r200?
It's only needed for Mach64 and older chips.
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Felix K?hling wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:39:48 +0100
> > We also found out that recent radeon and r200 snapshots should include
> > ati_drv.o. Did you read that thread ("something changed in r200" on
> > dri-users and dri-devel)?
>
> I've been trying to follow things but I skipped trhough that thread.
>
> I've add it to all ATI drivers (r128, radeon).
Thank you.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
