On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Havoc Pennington wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >>Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable, > >>anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even > >>think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need > >>such a thing.. > > > > > >Just a question of bandwidth/load then. I'm willing to try it. When > >we get general freedesktop.org anon mirrors we can always move to > >using those. > > > >To give you an idea of plans for the hosting and current status: > >https://listman.redhat.com/archives/xdg-list/2003-September/msg00001.html > > > >So what we can do is include DRI in the migration plan. From you guys > >we probably need details on the exact stuff to be hosted, and how you > >want to set it up; and I'd guess someone from DRI should have admin > >access to the server (let us know who). > > OK. > > If anyone is deeply unhappy with the idea of moving to freedesktop.org for > cvs hosting, it's time to speak up.
One question. Would this be a temporary thing or permanent move ? If temporary then I guess I'd rather just see a anoncvs mirror setup rather than move it in the first place. But if it's permanent, then it's o.k. with me. Obviously we wouldn't tear down the CVS at SF, but we'd need to update the website to point people where to grab the new CVS. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
