On 27 Jul 2003, Michel D�nzer wrote:
>
> Indeed, linux-kernel is too much for me to handle. I did post these
> changes long before committing them and would have appreciated feedback
> though, but sadly received none.
Hmm.. I follow dri-devel, but I didn't see any patches. I assume there is
a separate patch-list.
Since I'm not generally interested in most DRI patches, and since I _do_
try to keep the current kernels up-to-date wrt the DRI repository anyway,
maybe people who do DRI kernel patches could just Cc: me on them?
That still won't guarantee that I'll respond to them, of course, but at
least I'll be aware of them at some level.
> Looks beautiful indeed, but I'm not sure if there could be issues with
> the BSDs - Eric?
It should be pretty portable, since it handles any kind of irq return
value - whether void or not. So the BSD's should be happy with it too.
> Any great ideas for anything else Linus? :)
Hey, there's a few other #define's I hate that are pointless for a modern
kernel, but I don't have as clean solutions to them, and I can generally
just filter them out by hand when I do the merge.
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
