Am Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2003 16:06 schrieb Dieter N�tzel: > Am Sonntag, 23. Februar 2003 20:59 schrieb Keith Whitwell: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > >>What about processes that *don't* do a close - that just use an fd and > > >> exit. > > [-] > > > > The answer really is that you shouldn't care about the pid at all. > > > > OK, here's a patch, first attempt at doing this. It's not ready to > > commit yet, unless we start a branch for this... > > > > Things actually work pretty well, and a couple of lockups seem to have > > disappeared as a result. There are at least two issues: > > > > 1) Hard lockup when the X server recycles. > > 2) This breaks other OS's -- they'll need to play catchup, I think. > > Could this help? > SMP system (dual Athlon) > trunk, r200 with flip-1.diff and r200-flushvertices.diff (Michel). > > VTK/bin> ./TaskParallelism > r200AgeTextures 0 > r200AgeTextures 1 > r200AgeTextures 0 > r200AgeTextures 1 > Speicherschutzverletzung (core dumped) > VTK/bin> l core.3880 > -rw------- 1 nuetzel users 16687104 Feb 27 15:48 core.3880
Next try: VTK/bin> ./TaskParallelism r200AgeTextures 0 r200AgeTextures 1 r200AgeTextures 0 r200AgeTextures 1 TaskParallelism: r200_vtxfmt.c:949: r200VtxFmtFlushVertices: Assertion `vb.context == ctx' failed. Abbruch -Dieter ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
