> > <device id="0">
> > <application name="...
> > ...
> > </application>
> > <application name="...
> > ...
> > </application>
> > </device>
>
> I'm coming to conclusion more the more I think about it. I really can't
> come up with a good, real-world case to argue for
> application-then-device. Most of the cases where you'd want the
> application at the top level could be handled by putting a '<device
> id="*">' around it.
I would think that the common case would be:
most general settings
device 0 settings
device 1 settings
application x settings
settings specific to device 0 on application x
etc
I don't think "settings specific to device 0 on application x" would
ever actually come up, but the structure suggested would allow it.
--
Russ Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
