Felix K�hling wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> Dieter N�tzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:57 schrieb Felix K�hling:
>>
>>>On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:47:47 +0200
>>>
>>>Felix K�hling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -0700
>>>>
>>>>Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
>>>>>Module name: xc
>>>>>Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/
>>>>>Changes by: keithw@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/09/29 13:22:44
>>>>>
>>>>>Log message:
>>>>> irqwait patch from felix
>>>>>
>>>>>Modified files:
>>>>> xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/:
>>>>> radeon_context.c radeon_context.h radeon_ioctl.c
>>>>>
>>>>> Revision Changes Path
>>>>> 1.19 +1 -0
>>>>>xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_context.c 1.15 +1 -0
>>>>> xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_context.h 1.27 +54
>>>>>-49 xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c
>>>>>
>>>>Thanks for applying. However, this was yesterday's patch ;-). Just cvs
>>>>updated my tree and made a patch of my NEW waiting code against the
>>>>latest trunk. See "[patch] smart irq/busy wait in
>>>>radeonWaitForFrameCompletion" on dri-devel. I just realized that I
>>>>forgot to include radeon_context.[ch] in the patch posted with that
>>>>mail. :-| This one is complete.
>>>>
>>>Oops, forgot one debug message. Could you remove
>>> fprintf (stderr, "Waited %d.\r", wait);
>>>from radeon_ioctl.c line 692 manually? I don't want to spam the list
>>>with patches.
>>>
>>Is r100/r200 a completely different thing?
>>If not why not a patch against both?
>>Then the testing audience should be much "wider".
>>
>
> Sure. As far as I could see the code is very similar. However, this:
> rmesa->do_irqs = (0 &&
> rmesa->dri.drmMinor >= 6 &&
> !getenv("R200_NO_IRQS") &&
> rmesa->r200Screen->irq);
> looks like IRQs are turned off by default on R200. So my code wouldn't
> be used. Is the reason for IRQs being disabled that the frame throttling
> is not implemented properly or are there lower level problems with IRQs?
No, this is a hangover from the bugs last week. It can be removed now.
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
