On Saturday 06 July 2002 21:49, Jens Owen wrote:
> Oliver Feiler wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 July 2002 17:36, Oliver Feiler wrote:
> >>On Friday 05 July 2002 13:04, Jos� Fonseca wrote:
> >>>Keith Whitwell confirmed the readiness of the r200-0-1-branch for
> >>>testing and for binary snapshots.
> >>
> >>Just tested this driver on a system with original ATI 8500 card.
> >>
> >>With the binary snaphots and with the r200 branch compiled myself the
> >>system crashes immediately when X is started. With DRI disabled X comes
> >> up and runs without problems.
>
> Oliver,
>
> If you have the room for a fully debuggable X Server, try adding this
> patch before you build the X Server.
>
> Then login remotely and run gdb xc/programs/Xserver/XFree86 as root.
>
> If you can case the crash like that, post the backtrace to the list.

This is as far as it gets:

(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/kiza/work/r200-branch/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/XFree86 

XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (DRI trunk) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 18 January 2002
        If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
        newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
        reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.19-rc1 i686 [ELF] 
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
         (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
         (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Jul  7 15:09:13 2002
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config"

And here the system locks up. So it looks like the crash is happening very 
early or the complete output didn't make it over the network.

I installed on top of the 4.2.0 release.

Anything else I could try? Otherwise I think I'll just wait a bit until the 
driver is a bit older, since the owner of the computer where I'm testing it 
isn't exactly happy if I crash the system regularly. ;)

If the DRI module is not loaded in XF86Config X comes up without problems. So 
there shouldn't really be a problem?

Bye

-- 
Oliver Feiler  <kiza@(gmx.net|lionking.org|claws-and-paws.com)>
http://www.lionking.org/~kiza/  <--   homepage
PGP-key ID 0x561D4FD2    --> /pgpkey.shtml



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
We have stuff for geeks like you.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to