Eric Anholt wrote:
> 
> Just to update you all on what I'm doing: I have just finished getting
> some of the 4.2.0 patches and drm-kmod (DRM kernel modules in the
> FreeBSD port/package system) updates into the FreeBSD ports collection.
> At this point I think the biggest priority for FreeBSD is getting mesa
> 4.0 working, hopefully in the os-templated form.  I've got 3dfx working
> great, but ATI cards were just giving me a black window last I tried.
> I'll see what Alan's updates in the non-templated version have done and
> compare the templated version to them and to current linux source.
> After that I'll take a look at drmcommand (which sounds like it won't be
> too big of a deal to support, though I haven't looked at the code yet)
> and then tcl (again, haven't looked, but if it's just new ioctls it
> shouldn't be a problem and should be possible to roll into drm-kmod).

Eric,

Thanks for the update.  You have the right priorites from what I can
tell.  I didn't realize that FreeBSD was so far behind the DRI trunk.  I
thought it had Mesa 4 since Alan had merged FreeBSD support into the
trunk.

I'm pushing forward with the drmCommand interface.  Hopefully, it won't
give you any problems, because major changes will be very time consuming
after all the working drivers in the trunk have been converted.

Regards,
Jens

--                             /\
         Jens Owen            /  \/\ _    
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /    \ \ \   Steamboat Springs, Colorado

_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to