Dieter N�tzel wrote:
> On Sonntag, 3. M�rz 2002 18:09:18, Gareth Hughes wrote:
>> Dieter N�tzel wrote:
>> > CDEBUGFLAGS = -O -mcpu=k6 -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
>> > -malign-functions=4 -fschedule -insns2 -fexpensive-optimizations
>>
>> Hmmm, I'm not really sure that's legal (in terms of having reportable
>> results with a binary compiled like that) :-)
>
> He asked about self compiling...;-)))
Are these with the default CFLAGS or the K7 optimized?
> AMD 1 GHz Athlon II SlotA (0.18�m)
> MSI MS-6167 Rev 1.0B (AMD 750, Irongate C4, without bypass)
> 640 MB PC100-2-2-2 SDRAM
Same board :) 512MB ram, 800MHz T-bird.
> Linux 2.4.19-pre2-ac2 (incl. O(1)-scheduler) + preemption + lock-break
I don't have the other patches, just pre2-ac2.
> If you ever get your hands on such a system, you will _NEVER_ use Linux
I'll have to try adding the extra patches.
> Advanced Visualizer (AWadvs-04) Viewset
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test Weight Frames DList Visual Double Frame Buffer Accumulation
> # % Per Sec Build ID Buffer R G B A Z Stencil R G B A
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 21.00 15.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 2 21.00 14.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 3 14.00 20.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 4 14.00 21.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 5 6.00 14.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 6 5.00 15.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 7 5.00 14.70 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 8 4.00 18.00 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 9 4.00 16.90 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 10 3.00 17.50 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> 11 3.00 16.60 0.000 0X29 True 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0 0
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.948
X in 24bit depth (fb=32bit), on a Rage128 Pro PF 32M-SDR-SGRAM (AGP 2x mode)
1280x1024 (my normal working setup)
Advanced Visualizer (AWadvs-04) Viewset
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Weight Frames DList Visual Double Frame Buffer Accumulation
# % Per Sec Build ID Buffer R G B A Z Stencil R G B A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 21.00 1.10 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
2 21.00 1.60 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
3 14.00 3.40 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
4 14.00 3.80 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
5 6.00 1.50 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
6 5.00 1.10 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
7 5.00 1.50 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
8 4.00 3.20 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
9 4.00 3.60 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
10 3.00 3.40 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
11 3.00 3.80 0.000 0X23 True 8 8 8 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Geometric Mean = 1.999
Any one know what this card should do?
Should I try lower resolution and/or depth?
Are FB settings right?
-Thomas
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
