On 2002.02.20 02:07 Keith Whitwell wrote: > Jos� Fonseca wrote: > > > > ... > > > > Trunk: > > > > For the drivers at the trunk I'll assume that the user will have XFree > > 4.2.0 so it will only be necessary to pack: > > - the DDX driver (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/*_drv.o) > > - the Mesa driver (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/*_dri.so) > > and also: > > - the libGL (/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so) > > > > Is this sufficient? > > I belive so. In some respects it is a function of how divergent the > XFree on > peoples machines is from what's in DRI CVS. DRI's basically fucked up > backwards compatibility on every front until quite recently - we now have > backwards compatibility for kernel modules. But there are other > interfaces > the 3d driver deals with, specifically the DRI extension protocol to the > X > server. Thankfully this hasn't changed in a long time, and if it ever > does, > we know now to do it in a backwards-compatible way. > > My guess is this is going to be sufficient then for most if not all > cases. > > Have you looked at Alan H's tools for sanity-checking DRI installs? I've > always thought that these might be useful when trying to write an > installer > for DRI binary distributions. > > Keith >
Daryll mentioned them and said he would try to contact Alan. I don't have those scripts. Regards, Jos� Fonseca _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
