On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Rahul Karnik wrote:
> Thanks for all the help. For some reason the DRI
> module from 4.1.0 did not work with the DRM module I
> compiled from CVS (I got a "[drm]DRI version=4,
> expected 3 message"). With cable and my relatively
> fast computer I just compiled X from DRI CVS and fixed
> it.
>
> Now my request is not for myself, but for all those
> technologically challenged DRI users for whom using
> the binary downloads feature was not a convenience,
> but a necessity. Are we not losing those users? How
> hard would it be to keep the 4.1 stable binaries
> around, even if other development continued in DRI
> CVS?
A much easier thing to do would be to keep a copy of tarfile
with os-support so those who want can compile it themselves.
Vladimir Dergachev
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> =====
> ------------------
> Rahul Karnik
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
