On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:12:46AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> >It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
> >
> >For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> >dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
> >it is running on and passes that to the client (via the PCI id). If you
> >did this, you could also change the X tree to include the appropriate
> >glide.h header file and remove the dependency on Glide in X all
> >together. It should be relatively easy to put together.
>
> That sounds even better to me. If done though, wouldn't it cause
> problems with programs directly linked with Glide3?
The DRI glide is ONLY useful for the DRI. It won't function in stand
alone mode at all. In other words, there isn't just V3 and V5 versions,
but also V3-non-DRI, V3-DRI, V5-DRI versions. But, Glide is dead and I
wouldn't worry about it or support it.
- |Daryll
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
