> The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4. > (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.) Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any case, no matter if the kernel module works? Just alone for the fact that we then know that the driver module and kernel modules have matching versions? - Frank _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
- [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Will Newton
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Zephaniah E\. Hull
- RE: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Dieter N�tzel
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Frank Worsley
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Andreas Ehliar
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Brian Paul
- [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Vykupitel
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Adam Jackson
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Dave Airlie
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Ryan Underwood
- Re: [Dri-devel] tdfx driver Roland Scheidegger
