Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2013, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:41PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int standard_timing_level(struct edid *edid)
> > * monitors fill with ascii space (0x20) instead.
> > */
> > static int
> > -bad_std_timing(u8 a, u8 b)
> > +bad_std_timing(const u8 a, const u8 b)
> > {
> > return (a == 0x00 && b == 0x00) ||
> > (a == 0x01 && b == 0x01) ||
>
> Was this intended to go in here?
>
> > @@ -721,8 +721,8 @@ bad_std_timing(u8 a, u8 b)
> > * and convert them into a real mode using CVT/GTF/DMT.
> > */
> > static struct drm_display_mode *
> > -drm_mode_std(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid,
> > - struct std_timing *t, int revision)
> > +drm_mode_std(struct drm_connector *connector, const struct edid *edid,
> > + const struct std_timing *t, int revision)
> > {
> > struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> > struct drm_display_mode *m, *mode = NULL;
>
> I know I'm being picky, but you're constifying the t parameter here as
> well without saying so in the commit message.
>
Yes, probably I should have been a bit more elaborate in the commit
message. Both hunks are intentional, as I looked at how those functions
in the environment of the edid handling funcs are used and added const
where appropriate, not just strictly to the struct edid pointer.
Regards,
Lucas
