On 29.06.26 13:48, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 3:57 PM Robert Mader <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Mikhail,

thanks for the quick review! And no worries, I was very happy about your
patch, which is why I looked deeper into it in the first place.

Given the patch fixes a newly introduced regression (and is very
simple), do you think there's a chance to still get it into 7.1 - or
would it need to go via the usual 7.2/7.3 release schedule + backport?
Hi Robert,

The timing depends on Vivek and the drm-misc maintainers, not me,
but here's the situation as I understand it:

The original commit 504e2b4ab97a only landed in 7.2 (it went into
drm-misc-next, not drm-misc-fixes). So 7.1 was never affected by
the regression -- there's nothing to fix there.

For 7.2: since your patch fixes a regression introduced in the same
cycle, it would ideally go through drm-misc-fixes to land in 7.2
before release, avoiding a broken commit in the final tree. That's
the cleanest outcome.

Adding Vivek -- he pushed the original patch and would know whether
drm-misc-fixes is the right route at this point in the cycle.
Hi Mikhail, I of course meant 7.2, not 7.1, sorry! And agreed, that would be ideal / perfect.

--
Robert Mader
Consultant Software Developer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718

Reply via email to