Hi Heiko, On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2026, 12:05:07 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb > Vladimir Oltean: > > The dw_hdmi-rockchip driver validates pixel clock rates against the > > HDMI PHY's internal clock provider on certain SoCs like RK3328. > > This is currently achieved by dereferencing hdmi->phy->dev.of_node > > to obtain the provider node, which violates the Generic PHY API's > > encapsulation (the goal is for struct phy to be an opaque pointer > > with a hidden definition, to be interacted with only using API > > functions or NULL pointer checks, for the case where optional variants > > of phy_get() did not find a PHY). > > > > Refactor dw_hdmi_rockchip_bind() to perform a manual phandle lookup > > on the "hdmi" PHY index within the controller's DT node. This provides > > a parallel path to the clock provider's OF node without relying on the > > internal structure of the struct phy handle. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stueber <[email protected]> > > there is now already more stuff depending on this change [0], and > the change itself also is sort of independent of the whole > phy-series. And somehow this series itself sadly hasn't gotten > much review yet. > > So would you be ok with me just picking this one patch for the > drm-misc-tree? > > > Thanks > Heiko > > [0] > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/
I am currently out of office, so I can't look very closely, but yes, I did agree with Vinod to try to reduce the size of this series by submitting some of the changes this cycle to individual subsystems, and the cross-tree remainder the following cycle. So yes, feel free to pick from this series and I'll submit to dri-devel whatever remains when I return to this activity.
