Hi Antonin, thanks for this first patch!

Note about the subject: if you look at patches under
`drivers/gpu/nova-core`, you will notice that they all use the same
prefix (`gpu: nova-core:`). Here since you touch the `gsp` module,
you'll want to refine it further to `gpu: nova-core: gsp:`.

On Sun May 17, 2026 at 1:14 AM JST, Antonin Malzieu Ridolfi wrote:
> First babystep to split the register definitions grouped in nova root
> register file to the module which actually use them.

nit: "first babystep" is irrelevant for the git history, we prefer to
keep the log strictly factual. If you want to add side-comments, you can
do so after the `---` marker - these won't be picked up when the patch
is applied.

>
> Suggested-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Antonin Malzieu Ridolfi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp.rs      |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/cmdq.rs |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/regs.rs | 11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/regs.rs     |  8 --------
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/nova-core/gsp/regs.rs

The patch in itself looks exactly like expected. The reduced visibility
is definitely nice.

I suppose you will want to send a v2 addressing this feedback; feel free
to include one or more extra obvious modules as additional patches if
you feel like it. This is the kind of rework that can be merged quickly.

Reply via email to