On Fri Jan 30, 2026 at 3:24 PM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote: > From: Asahi Lina <[email protected]> > > This is just for basic usage in the DRM shmem abstractions for implied > locking, not intended as a full DMA Reservation abstraction yet. > > Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> > --- > Taken from: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > with __rust_helper added. > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h | 1 + > rust/helpers/dma-resv.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > rust/helpers/helpers.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index > 618becae72985b9dfdca8469ee48d4752fd0ca41..8d44728261ffa82fc36fa0c5df3b11a5bfb4339b > 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -7467,6 +7467,7 @@ L: [email protected] > S: Supported > W: https://rust-for-linux.com > T: git > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git > +F: rust/helpers/dma-resv.c > F: rust/helpers/dma.c > F: rust/helpers/scatterlist.c > F: rust/kernel/dma.rs
That's fine for me in general, but maybe the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK is probably the correct place. DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK is also under the DRM umbrella, so we should also add it to the drm-rust entry as well.
