On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 06:47:37PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > From: Tomasz Unger <[email protected]>
We do not accept changes without explanations. Also where did you get this idea to convert udelay() to usleep_range()? The API (in case it's okay to use) should be fsleep() nowadays. (Note as well that we refer to the functions as 'func()' in the text.) And last, but not least: have you checked carefully that this is even possible change? This is quite a change in the behaviour and needs very good justification and testing. TL;DR: if any tool suggested this change to you, go and fix that tool to stop spreading misleading ARs! P.S. NAK to all your three patches. Also check https://lore.kernel.org ML archives on the similar changes in the past, they were all NAKed (rejected). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
