On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:35:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 7:34 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > We now have a third platform broken by > > c9b1150a68d9362a0827609fc0dc1664c0d8bfe1, see [1]. I think this calls > > for a revert, to give us the time to implement a correct solution. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/caamcf8di8sc_xvzanzq9suiuf-ayvg2yjhx2dwmvvcnff3p...@mail.gmail.com > > This is a mess. > > But OK let's see if we can deal with the mess. > > I will make an RFT patch for Rockchip as well and resend at the > tail of the patch series if we want to try to fix also that one.
What bothers me here is that we're rushing to fix three different platforms, with others possibly broken as well, in a way that nobody really likes. That's why I think a revert would be better, to give us the time to then design a proper solution. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
