> On 1 Dec 2025, at 16:35, John Hubbard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 12/1/25 8:51 AM, Daniel Almeida wrote:
>>> On 29 Nov 2025, at 18:30, Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>>> +#[repr(transparent)]
>>> +pub struct ClistHead(Opaque<bindings::list_head>);
>> 
>> I still think we should call this CList. IMHO, it does not make sense to 
>> have a
> 
> I am guessing you meant to place this comment after Clist, rather than here
> (after ClistHead)? Otherwise I don't know what you are actually suggesting?
> 
>> Clist, and a ClistHead (notice the capitalization). CList and CListHead are
>> easier to read and reason about.
>> 
>> Did anyone push back on this?
> 
> If you are simply recommending renaming:
>    Clist     --> CList
>    ClistHead --> CListHead

Yes, this is what I meant.

> 
> ...then I'd say "+1" for that suggestion.
> 
> thanks,
> -- 
> John Hubbard
> 
> 

Reply via email to