Hello,

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 12:34:23PM +0100, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> On 11/25/25 13:31, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 5:10 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> having no clue about Rust:
> >>
> >> Can this patch be applied independent of the others via the pwm tree? If
> >> I understand correctly it's only patch #10 that depends on the previous
> >> patches, right?
> >>
> >> Is there already a merge plan for this series?
> > 
> > Yeah, if subsystems pick the independent patches at their own pace,
> > then that is great, so please do!
> > 
> > Then, after 1 or 2 cycles, we can do the flag day change on the Rust
> > tree (with any last changes needed Ack'd, but ideally there will be
> > none remaining).
> > 
> > It is what did in similar cases for renaming (or moving across the
> > path hierarchy) things in Rust. For simple things that get Ack'd quick
> > enough by everyone, sometimes we may be able to take everything in the
> > Rust tree.
> 
> I think code wise it's fine, provided the subject is fixed like Uwe suggested.
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Wilczynski <[email protected]>

OK, I applied it to

        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git 
pwm/for-nexxt

. I will rebase this branch to v6.19-rc1 once that's released and then
send it to Linus for v6.20-rc1 (assuming he has so many fingers and toes
to not switch to 7.0 before :-).

If it turns out to go in via the rust tree, tell me, then I'll drop it.
In that case take my

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>

Best regards and thanks for the patch and the reviews,
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to