Hi Philipp,
in the subject /dma_fenc_signal/dma_fence_signal/
> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
> {
> struct xe_hw_fence *fence, *next;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int err;
> bool tmp;
>
> if (XE_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&irq->pending))) {
> @@ -93,9 +92,9 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next, &irq->pending, irq_link) {
> list_del_init(&fence->irq_link);
> - err = dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->dma);
why don't we do
XE_WARN_ON(dma_fence_signal_locked(..))
instead?
Andi
> + XE_WARN_ON(dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(&fence->dma));
> + dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->dma);
> dma_fence_put(&fence->dma);
> - XE_WARN_ON(err);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->lock, flags);
> dma_fence_end_signalling(tmp);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
