The return code of dma_fence_signal() is not really useful as there is
nothing reasonable to do if a fence was already signaled. That return
code shall be removed from the kernel.

Moreover, dma_fence_signal() should not be used to check whether fences
are signaled. That's what dma_fence_is_signaled() and
dma_fence_test_signaled_flag() exist for.

Replace the non-canonical usage of dma_fence_signal().

Suggested-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c
index 27a36045410b..9fc93859f36f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c
@@ -126,17 +126,14 @@ static int test_signaling(void *arg)
                goto err_free;
        }
 
-       if (dma_fence_signal(f)) {
-               pr_err("Fence reported being already signaled\n");
-               goto err_free;
-       }
+       dma_fence_signal(f);
 
        if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
                pr_err("Fence not reporting signaled\n");
                goto err_free;
        }
 
-       if (!dma_fence_signal(f)) {
+       if (!dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(f)) {
                pr_err("Fence reported not being already signaled\n");
                goto err_free;
        }
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to