On 29/10/2025 11:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 at 18:15, Tomi Valkeinen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 05/10/2025 06:02, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h
>>> @@ -246,14 +246,14 @@
>>>
>>>  #define VCLKSET                              0x100c
>>>  #define VCLKSET_CKEN                 (1 << 16)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_COLOR_RGB            (0 << 8)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_COLOR_YCC            (1 << 8)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_COLOR_YCC            (1 << 8) /* 0:RGB 1:YCbCr */
>>>  #define VCLKSET_DIV_V3U(x)           (((x) & 0x3) << 4)
>>>  #define VCLKSET_DIV_V4H(x)           (((x) & 0x7) << 4)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_BPP_16                       (0 << 2)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_BPP_18                       (1 << 2)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_BPP_18L                      (2 << 2)
>>> -#define VCLKSET_BPP_24                       (3 << 2)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_BPP_MASK             (3 << 2)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_BPP_16                       FIELD_PREP(VCLKSET_BPP_MASK, 
>>> 0)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_BPP_18                       FIELD_PREP(VCLKSET_BPP_MASK, 
>>> 1)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_BPP_18L                      FIELD_PREP(VCLKSET_BPP_MASK, 
>>> 2)
>>> +#define VCLKSET_BPP_24                       FIELD_PREP(VCLKSET_BPP_MASK, 
>>> 3)
>>>  #define VCLKSET_LANE(x)                      (((x) & 0x3) << 0)
>> It probably doesn't matter, but just wanted to mention: here FIELD_PREP
>> is used with, e.g., (3 << 2). GENMASK returns an unsigned value, whereas
>> (3 << 2) is signed.
> 
> Huh?
> 
> Either you use the unshifted value "(define for) 3" with FIELD_PREP(),
> or you use the shifted value "(define for) (3 << 2)" without FIELD_PREP()?
Sure. My point was, VCLKSET_BPP_MASK is a signed value, but GENMASK()
would produce an unsigned value. Normally FIELD_PREP() is used with
GENMASK, i.e. with unsigned mask, but here FIELD_PREP is used with a
signed mask. Does it matter? I don't know, most likely not.

 Tomi

Reply via email to