On 2025-10-17 at 12:41 +1100, Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> wrote...
> On Fri Oct 17, 2025 at 9:56 AM JST, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > On 2025-10-16 at 17:24 +1100, Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> 
> > wrote...
> >> On Mon Oct 13, 2025 at 3:20 PM JST, Alistair Popple wrote:
> >> > Adds bindings and an in-place initialiser for the GspSystemInfo struct.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <[email protected]>
> >> 
> >> I am getting a new unused warnings on this patch - we should either
> >> annotate or merge.
> >
> > Yeah there are quite a few unused warnings. They're a pain to deal with 
> > during
> > patch revisions and rebasing/rewriting so I was waiting until all the 
> > comments
> > settled down before dealing with them as it's pretty tedious work adding 
> > lint
> > statements in one patch and removing them in the next.
> >
> > As you say the easiest solution is just to merge patches, but that just 
> > promotes
> > larger patches. I wish we didn't have to make that trade off, but I guess 
> > if we
> > want clippy bisection to be clean we have to.
> >
> > I will probably just merge all the bindings into the patches that use them.
> 
> Miguel's suggestion of adding a temporary, file-global `expect(unused)`
> directive would also work very well if you want to preserve the patch
> sequence.

Yeah, I quite liked that suggestion as a way of alleviating some of the tedium.
But given the bindings are pretty self-contained anyway lets just squash them.

Reply via email to