On 9/26/2025 7:35 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 02:55:19PM +0530, Ayushi Makhija wrote:
>> On 9/26/2025 3:32 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:06:01AM +0530, Ayushi Makhija wrote:
>>>> Add device tree nodes for the DSI0 controller with their corresponding
>>>> PHY found on Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ayushi Makhija <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + mdss_dsi0_phy: phy@ae94400 {
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dsi-phy-5nm";
>>>
>>> Add qcs8300-specific compatible and use sa8775p as a fallback
>>>
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> I have one doubt, even though the ctrl and phy versions for sa8775p(LeMans)
>> and qcs8300(Monaco) are same.
>> Why can't we use the same compatible string that we have used for LeMans
>> ctrl and phy ? what is the need to define a separate
>> compatible string for monaco ctrl and phy ?
>
> Konrad responded with the reason. But also, this question should have
> been asked when you took a first look at the qcom,qcs8300-mdss.yaml.
> It has two compats for DPU, DP and eDP PHY blocks (for exactly the same
> reason).
>
Hi Dmitry/Konard,
The previous explanation regarding the use of two compatible strings for DPU/DP
was unclear, but it is now well understood. Thanks, for the clarification.
Thanks,
Ayushi
