Hi Sumit,

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 11:40:11AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
> 
> 
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 at 13:51, Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We've discussed a number of times of how some heap names are bad, but
> > not really what makes a good heap name.
> >
> > Let's document what we expect the heap names to look like.
> Thank you for the patch. In principle, I'm ok to take this patch, with
> the obvious understanding that if there are future heap name
> requirements that can't be satisfied with these rules, we will discuss
> and adapt the rules accordingly.
> 
> I hope this sounds reasonable to all.
> 
> If I don't hear any objections, I'll merge this by this weekend.

As far as I know, it's still not merged?

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to