Hi Philipp,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.17 next-20251010]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Philipp-Stanner/drm-sched-Add-warning-for-removing-hack-in-drm_sched_fini/20251010-120556
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
patch link:    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251009125928.250652-2-phasta%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] drm/sched: Add warning for removing hack in 
drm_sched_fini()
config: parisc-randconfig-r072-20251011 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510110929.axiihbe0-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510110929.axiihbe0-...@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
| Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510110929.axiihbe0-...@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/wait.h:7,
                    from drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:70:
   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c: In function 'drm_sched_fini':
>> include/linux/list.h:784:2: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... 
>> [-Wmisleading-indentation]
     for (pos = list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member); \
     ^~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:1422:3: note: in expansion of macro 
'list_for_each_entry'
      list_for_each_entry(s_entity, &rq->entities, list)
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:1446:4: note: ...this statement, but 
the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
       s_entity->stopped = true;
       ^~~~~~~~


vim +/for +784 include/linux/list.h

4d70c74659d9746 Andy Shevchenko 2022-11-30  767  
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  768  /**
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  769   * list_entry_is_head - test 
if the entry points to the head of the list
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  770   * @pos:       the type * to 
cursor
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  771   * @head:      the head for 
your list.
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  772   * @member:    the name of the 
list_head within the struct.
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  773   */
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  774  #define 
list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member)                          \
2932fb0a927d306 Wei Yang        2024-02-08  775         
list_is_head(&pos->member, (head))
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  776  
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  777  /**
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  778   * list_for_each_entry -       
iterate over list of given type
8e3a67a99231f9f Randy Dunlap    2006-06-25  779   * @pos:       the type * to 
use as a loop cursor.
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  780   * @head:      the head for 
your list.
3943f42c11896ce Andrey Utkin    2014-11-14  781   * @member:    the name of the 
list_head within the struct.
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  782   */
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  783  #define 
list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member)                         \
93be3c2eb3371f0 Oleg Nesterov   2013-11-12 @784         for (pos = 
list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member);        \
e130816164e244b Andy Shevchenko 2020-10-15  785              
!list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member);                    \
8120e2e5141a420 Oleg Nesterov   2013-11-12  786              pos = 
list_next_entry(pos, member))
^1da177e4c3f415 Linus Torvalds  2005-04-16  787  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Reply via email to