On 19/09/2025 17:43, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Commit de8548813824 ("drm/panthor: Add the scheduler logical block")
> handled destruction of a group's queues' drm scheduler entities early
> into the group destruction procedure.
> 
> However, that races with the group submit ioctl, because by the time
> entities are destroyed (through the group destroy ioctl), the submission
> procedure might've already obtained a group handle, and therefore the
> ability to push jobs into entities. This is met with a DRM error message
> within the drm scheduler core as a situation that should never occur.
> 
> Fix by deferring drm scheduler entity destruction to queue release time.
> 
> Fixes: de8548813824 ("drm/panthor: Add the scheduler logical block")
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.laru...@collabora.com>

Applied to drm-misc-fixes.

Thanks,
Steve

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> index 0cc9055f4ee5..f5e01cb16cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> @@ -898,8 +898,7 @@ static void group_free_queue(struct panthor_group *group, 
> struct panthor_queue *
>       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(queue))
>               return;
>  
> -     if (queue->entity.fence_context)
> -             drm_sched_entity_destroy(&queue->entity);
> +     drm_sched_entity_destroy(&queue->entity);
>  
>       if (queue->scheduler.ops)
>               drm_sched_fini(&queue->scheduler);
> @@ -3609,11 +3608,6 @@ int panthor_group_destroy(struct panthor_file *pfile, 
> u32 group_handle)
>       if (!group)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     for (u32 i = 0; i < group->queue_count; i++) {
> -             if (group->queues[i])
> -                     drm_sched_entity_destroy(&group->queues[i]->entity);
> -     }
> -
>       mutex_lock(&sched->reset.lock);
>       mutex_lock(&sched->lock);
>       group->destroyed = true;

Reply via email to