On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:48:11AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:20:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 6.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > Thanks for queuing this and the corresponding reverts for the other > stable trees. This one patch doesn't match what I sent, the address > should be changed to DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET not to DP_DPCD_REV, see > [1]. I still think that's the correct thing to do here conforming to the > DP Standard and matching what the upstream kernel does, also solving a > link training issue for a DP2.0 docking station. > > The reverts queued for the other stable trees are correct, since for > now I do not want to change the behavior in those (i.e. those trees > should continue to use the DP_DPCD_REV register matching what's been the > case since the DPCD probing was introduced).
Ick, why were the values different for different branches? That feels wrong, and is why I missed that. Can you just send a fix-up patch for the one I got wrong? thanks, greg k-h
