在 2025-08-15星期五的 11:09 +0200，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： > On 15/08/2025 00:04, Rob Herring wrote: > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Icenowy Zheng <[email protected]> > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + $nodename: > > > + pattern: "^display@[0-9a-f]+$" > > > + > > > + compatible: > > > + const: verisilicon,dc > > > > If the clocks or resets varies by platform, then you need an SoC > > specific compatible still. If these clocks/resets are straight from > > the > > RTL and any other number of clocks/resets is wrong, then we can > > stick > > with just this compatible. > > Shouldn't we have here always SoC compatible? Can it be ever used > alone, > outside of given SoC? > > I could imagine now: > > items: > - {} > - const: verisilicon,dc
I followed the `vivante,gc` situation here, because the registers before 0x1400 (where real display-related things start) seems to follow the same scheme with GC-series GPUs, including the identification registers. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
