On 7/22/2025 5:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/07/2025 11:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 22/07/2025 12:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 22/07/2025 09:22, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >>>> The QCS615 platform is based on the SM6150 SoC. Since the DP hardware is >>>> shared with SM6150, the compatible string qcom,sm6150-dp is used to >>>> represent the DP controller on QCS615. >>> >>> No, you cannot use other SoC compatible for different one. Look at >>> qcs615.dtsi and board DTS - there is nothing saying that this is the >>> same die. >> Please take another look, we even have renamed qcs615.dtsi to sm6150.dtsi > I checked on recent next, although not latest next-20250716. Commit msg > should explain that. Any qcs615 feel then inappropriate here. > > Subject says clearly "on QCS615". Patch does something completely else! > > For gods sake how anyone can understand this? Sorry，I’ve verified full functionality with the DTSI on the 7/15 linux-next version, and also checked patch conflicts and checkpatch issues against the 7/22 version.
Based on your comments, I noticed that the DTSI rename from qcs615.dtsi to sm6150.dtsi was already merged on 7/16: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ I’ll update all related descriptions for qcs615 and sm6150 in the next patch version, and reverify full functionality with the latest linux-next image. Thanks again for pointing this out. > Best regards, > Krzysztof
