Hey, Den 2025-07-22 kl. 09:53, skrev Jacek Lawrynowicz: > Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <[email protected]>
Thanks, pushed to misc-next. Best regards, ~Maarten > On 7/15/2025 6:59 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> This breaks on PREEMPT_RT, and should be unneeded since >> lockdep can track irq disabled status itself. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c >> index 39f83225c1815..5f00809d448af 100644 >> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c >> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c >> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ ivpu_ipc_rx_msg_add(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct >> ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons, >> struct ivpu_ipc_rx_msg *rx_msg; >> >> lockdep_assert_held(&ipc->cons_lock); >> - lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); >> >> rx_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rx_msg), GFP_ATOMIC); >> if (!rx_msg) { >
