On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 12/06/2025 06:40, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:51:24PM -0700, Juston Li wrote:
Add TRACE_GPU_MEM tracepoints for tracking global and per-process GPU
memory usage.

These are required by VSR on Android 12+ for reporting GPU driver memory
allocations.

v3:
- Use now configurable CONFIG_TRACE_GPU_MEM instead of adding a
  per-driver Kconfig (Lucas)

v2:
- Use u64 as preferred by checkpatch (Tvrtko)
- Fix errors in comments/Kconfig description (Tvrtko)
- drop redundant "CONFIG" in Kconfig

Signed-off-by: Juston Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c           | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 16 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 4e39188a021ab..89a3d23e3b800 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@

#include <kunit/static_stub.h>

+#include <trace/events/gpu_mem.h>
+
#include "xe_device.h"
#include "xe_dma_buf.h"
#include "xe_drm_client.h"
@@ -418,6 +420,35 @@ static void xe_ttm_tt_account_subtract(struct xe_device *xe, struct ttm_tt *tt)
        xe_shrinker_mod_pages(xe->mem.shrinker, -(long)tt->num_pages, 0);
}

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_GPU_MEM)
+static void update_global_total_pages(struct ttm_device *ttm_dev, long num_pages)
+{
+    struct xe_device *xe = ttm_to_xe_device(ttm_dev);
+    u64 global_total_pages =
+        atomic64_add_return(num_pages, &xe->global_total_pages);
+
+    trace_gpu_mem_total(0, 0, global_total_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static void update_process_mem(struct drm_file *file, ssize_t size)
+{
+    struct xe_file *xef = to_xe_file(file);
+    u64 process_mem = atomic64_add_return(size, &xef->process_mem);
+
+    rcu_read_lock(); /* Locks file->pid! */
+    trace_gpu_mem_total(0, pid_nr(rcu_dereference(file->pid)), process_mem);

Isn't the first arg supposed to be the gpu id? Doesn't this become
invalid when I have e.g. LNL + BMG and the trace is enabled?

Good point.

u32 gpu_id does not seem possible to map to anything useful.

maybe minor_id? although I'm not sure if the intention is to share this
outside drm as seems the case.


Shall we replace it with a string obtained from dev_name(struct device *) ? As only Android parses them I think we can get still away with changing the tracepoints ABI.

works for me too. Is Android actually parsing it or just ignoring?
Because afaics it's always 0 in msm.

Lucas De Marchi

Reply via email to