On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 04:02:01PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On Sat, 10 May 2025 10:43:04 +0200 > Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> > > Thanks for looking at this series! > > Unfortunately the exynos patch is still needing a decision. Quick recap > of the story: > > 1. patch was sent in v2, nobody acked/reviewed it [1] > 2. was applied by mistake to drm-misc-next [2] > 3. you pinged maintainers, no reply do far -> should be reverted [3] > 4. Louis (fomys) asked on IRC how to handle it, no reply [4] > 5. in this v3 I added a revert (patch 1), no acks/reviews on it [5] > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250424-drm-bridge-convert-to-alloc-api-v2-14-8f91a404d...@bootlin.com/ > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > [3] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250430-arrogant-marmoset-of-justice-92ced3@houat/ > [4] > https://dri.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/index.php?channel=dri-devel&highlight_names=&date=2025-05-07 > [5] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250509-drm-bridge-convert-to-alloc-api-v3-1-b8bc1f16d...@bootlin.com/ > > What to do? Proposed plan: > > 1. Louis immediately applies the revert (patch 1)
I can't help but notice that both Louis and you have bootlin.com email addresses. Granted the lack of responses, can't you ping him internally? > 2. I send v4 with the original patch to hopefully be reviewed/acked > > Plan is OK? > > I'm assuming Louis doesn't need an Acked/Reviewed-by for that, but I might > be wrong, and we both would like to avoid further mess. > > This annoying issue is taking much more effort to be fixed than it took > to develop it. I'd like to get past it and think about the next steps > in bridge lifetime management. > > Thanks for your understanding. > > Luca > > -- > Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- With best wishes Dmitry
