On 5/8/25 8:25 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> From: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> >> >> This bit is set iff the UBWC version is 1.0. That notably does not >> include QCM2290's "no UBWC". > > While this is technically true, AFAIK the only difference between UBWC > 1.0 and 2.0 is that newer UBWC disables level 1 bank swizzling, which > is why I originally wrote it this way. There's a bit of redundancy > between the UBWC version and ubwc_swizzle bit 0.
It turns out to be a hardware matter Konrad
