The i915_oa_stream_destroy() function directly accesses the ratelimit_state structure's ->missed field, which works, but which also makes it more difficult to change this field. Therefore, make use of the ratelimit_state_get_miss() function instead of directly accessing the ->missed field.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe93a52-365e-47fe-93a4-44a44547d601@paulmck-laptop/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]> Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c index de0b413600a15..1658f1246c6fa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c @@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct i915_perf_stream *stream) struct i915_perf *perf = stream->perf; struct intel_gt *gt = stream->engine->gt; struct i915_perf_group *g = stream->engine->oa_group; + int m; if (WARN_ON(stream != g->exclusive_stream)) return; @@ -1690,10 +1691,9 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct i915_perf_stream *stream) free_oa_configs(stream); free_noa_wait(stream); - if (perf->spurious_report_rs.missed) { - gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to ratelimiting\n", - perf->spurious_report_rs.missed); - } + m = ratelimit_state_get_miss(&perf->spurious_report_rs); + if (m) + gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to ratelimiting\n", m); } static void gen7_init_oa_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream) -- 2.40.1
