On 29/10/24 19:11, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 10:18 AM R Sundar <[email protected]> wrote:

Use string choice helpers for better readability.

I personally find this less readable, but if this is the preferred
method going forward, I'm fine to take the patch.

Alex


Hi,

Thanks for the comments.

I came across this comments in string_choices.h files, where str_read_write() helpers are present.

Using these helpers offers the following benefits: 1) Reducing the hardcoding of strings, which makes the code more elegant through these simple literal-meaning helpers. 2) Unifying the output, which prevents the same string from being printed in various forms, such as enable/disable, enabled/disabled, en/dis.
 3) Deduping by the linker, which results in a smaller binary file.

Kindly, I'm leaving the decision to maintainers.

Thanks,
Sundar


Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: R Sundar <[email protected]>
---

reported in linux repository.

tree:  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c:145:8-12: opportunity for 
str_read_write(read)

vim +145 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c
index 35fee3e8cde2..8cd69836dd99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eeprom.c
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int amdgpu_eeprom_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap, 
u32 eeprom_addr,
                 dev_err_ratelimited(&i2c_adap->dev,
                                     "maddr:0x%04X size:0x%02X:quirk max_%s_len must be 
> %d",
                                     eeprom_addr, buf_size,
-                                   read ? "read" : "write", 
EEPROM_OFFSET_SIZE);
+                                   str_read_write(read), EEPROM_OFFSET_SIZE);
                 return -EINVAL;
         }

--
2.34.1


Reply via email to