On Thu, 03 Oct 2024, Uros Bizjak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Replace this pattern in active_fence_cb():
>
>     cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old
>
> ... with the simpler and faster:
>
>     try_cmpxchg(*ptr, &old, new)
>
> The x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in the ZF flag,
> so this change saves a compare after the CMPXCHG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>

Pushed to drm-intel-next, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index 5ec293011d99..35319228bc51 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ active_fence_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct 
> dma_fence_cb *cb)
>       struct i915_active_fence *active =
>               container_of(cb, typeof(*active), cb);
>  
> -     return cmpxchg(__active_fence_slot(active), fence, NULL) == fence;
> +     return try_cmpxchg(__active_fence_slot(active), &fence, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  static void

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to