Hi,

Charles Han <[email protected]> 于2024年8月23日周五 16:37写道:
>
> In hx83102_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is
> assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer
> dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid
> npd.
>
> Fixes: 0ef94554dc40 ("drm/panel: himax-hx83102: Break out as  separate 
> driver")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-himax-hx83102.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-himax-hx83102.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-himax-hx83102.c
> index 7c2a5e9b7fb3..e61ed7d02729 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-himax-hx83102.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-himax-hx83102.c
> @@ -566,7 +566,6 @@ static int hx83102_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
>
>         mode = drm_mode_duplicate(connector->dev, m);
>         if (!mode) {
> -               dev_err(&ctx->dsi->dev, "bad mode or failed to add mode\n");

Your V2 patch should not depend V1, should make patches on the base code.
And when you send the next release, explain the differences from the previous
submission in a cover letter or a single patch.
see 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#respond-to-review-comments

In addition, Doug made some comments in V1, you should CC him when
sending patches.

>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }

nit: remove brackets


>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Reply via email to