Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-20 03:16:09)
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:38:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +     ptr = devres_alloc(devm_typec_switch_unregister, sizeof(*ptr), 
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!ptr)
> > +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > +     switch_dev = typec_switch_register(parent ,desc);
> > +     if (!IS_ERR(switch_dev)) {
> > +             *ptr = switch_dev;
> > +             devres_add(parent, ptr);
> > +     } else {
> > +             devres_free(ptr);
> > +     }
>
> devm_add_action_or_reset() ?
>

No. We don't want to call the 'action' devm_typec_switch_unregister()
when it fails because that would unregister a switch that has never been
registered.

Reply via email to