The ce->guc_state.lock was made to protect guc_prio, which
indicates the GuC priority level.

But at the begnning of the function we perform some sanity check
of guc_prio outside its protected section. Move them within the
locked region.

Use this occasion to expand the if statement to make it clearer.

Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>

Changelog
=========
 - Removed the stable tags as this path is not normally under
   multi task stress.
 - Refactored the if statements in order to remove unnecessary
   checks (thanks, Daniele)
 - Added Matt's r-b.


 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 27 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 0eaa1064242c..9400d0eb682b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -4267,20 +4267,25 @@ static void guc_bump_inflight_request_prio(struct 
i915_request *rq,
        u8 new_guc_prio = map_i915_prio_to_guc_prio(prio);
 
        /* Short circuit function */
-       if (prio < I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL ||
-           rq->guc_prio == GUC_PRIO_FINI ||
-           (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_INIT &&
-            !new_guc_prio_higher(rq->guc_prio, new_guc_prio)))
+       if (prio < I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL)
                return;
 
        spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
-       if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_FINI) {
-               if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_INIT)
-                       sub_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
-               rq->guc_prio = new_guc_prio;
-               add_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
-               update_context_prio(ce);
-       }
+
+       if (rq->guc_prio == GUC_PRIO_FINI)
+               goto exit;
+
+       if (!new_guc_prio_higher(rq->guc_prio, new_guc_prio))
+               goto exit;
+
+       if (rq->guc_prio != GUC_PRIO_INIT)
+               sub_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
+
+       rq->guc_prio = new_guc_prio;
+       add_context_inflight_prio(ce, rq->guc_prio);
+       update_context_prio(ce);
+
+exit:
        spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 }
 
-- 
2.45.1

Reply via email to