On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:11:55PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix spelling mistakes as reported by codespell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Both dma-buf spell fixes applied to drm-misc-next, thanks!
-Sima
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void dma_resv_iter_walk_unlocked(
>   *
>   * Beware that the iterator can be restarted.  Code which accumulates 
> statistics
>   * or similar needs to check for this with dma_resv_iter_is_restarted(). For
> - * this reason prefer the locked dma_resv_iter_first() whenver possible.
> + * this reason prefer the locked dma_resv_iter_first() whenever possible.
>   *
>   * Returns the first fence from an unlocked dma_resv obj.
>   */
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_iter_first_unlock
>   *
>   * Beware that the iterator can be restarted.  Code which accumulates 
> statistics
>   * or similar needs to check for this with dma_resv_iter_is_restarted(). For
> - * this reason prefer the locked dma_resv_iter_next() whenver possible.
> + * this reason prefer the locked dma_resv_iter_next() whenever possible.
>   *
>   * Returns the next fence from an unlocked dma_resv obj.
>   */
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to